Blog

Thomas Sayers Ellis at USF

2006-12-21_ellisTwo things about this reading from our visiting writer I feel so lucky to have scored my first year here:

  • “There’s no such thing as formlessness.” — This as a kind of refrain toward the end of his reading “No Easy Task”. TSE (fortunate poetic initials; I’ve heard Thomas now twice make Prufrock jokes) read with James Middlename Louis/Lewis, a saxophonist, who played along. It was great, a performance more than a reading, esp. for this poem about performance. At any rate, I found it useful advice, particularly at a time when I’m wanting less control in my paragraphs, or I’m wanting to exert less control over my paragraphs.
  • Poems don’t have a lock on poetry. — This in response to a person’s question about the pressures Ellis feels to progress as a poet, or with his poems. Poems are something we exchange or talk about in workshops, but poetry is something harder to grasp and something larger. Something regarding imagination, invention, and so on. I, self-absorbedly, tried to see if there’s a nonfiction equivalent. I think some would argue that essays don’t have a lock on essaying, and that’s true in a way I can’t do much with. It’s true that poets and fiction writers essay. I often like to say that memoirs don’t have a lock on nonfiction, but again—Ellis’s statement isn’t quibbling over subgenres’ ownership of the genre. I see it as a project: what art of nonfiction can the nonfictioneer practice beyond the page. What, that is, other than winning at pub trivia night, which I hope to do again this Thursday with my stellar team: Panda Express?

Perhaps what’s most exciting about Thomas being here this year at USF is that his latest book, Skin Inc., has a section titled “The Judges of Craft”. Here’s its epigraph:

Thanks for your note. We’re actually very interested in poems that address issues of race and racism and wish we could run more of them. Most of what we get in that regard is mere subject matter; that is, there’s not enough craft to carry to content (though this is certainly not the case with “Spike Lee at Harvard,” which I am sure you’ll place somewhere very good).

There’s enough to be said about “craft” as a concept and as a law in the instruction and proliferation of writing, but that’s another post. This one’s about this: yearlong visiting writers are such a valuable resource (potentially) to writing programs they should be granted a kind of tenure. It’s an incredible thing to have a well published, well respected member on the full faculty who’s leaving at the end of the year. Every program needs such a shake up.

Personal Statement

MFA-app season is coming up. In search of other documents, I found the personal statement I wrote in 2002 the first time (of three total times) I applied to graduate writing programs. It’s complicatedly awful. As a kind of aid for others, it’s posted here, word-for-word:

On a trip across the country in a car with a lifelong friend, I dreamt mostly of homes. Not home, mind you, but homes: three-story, five-bedroom houses decorated everywhere in robin’s-egg blue; sleek and modern apartments seemingly ripped from the pages of the IKEA catalogue; brightly colored houses filled with passageways and compartments, much like the ones I dreamt of as a kid. Dreaming about homes while living as a transient made some pop-psychological sense, but something else about this recurring dream-setting struck me. Even though I had never seen these homes before—awake or asleep—I knew immediately and intuitively that they were mine. In the logic of these dreams, I was always home.

This is in no way a dream-practice particular to me; everyone’s dreams distort his or her life’s realities. We all get a kick out of our minds’ abilities to create this sensual familiarity out of our own visual innovation, it’s one of the greatest yet most common powers we feel as dreamers. In other words, when we tell each other, “I dreamt about you last night, but it wasn’t you. Y’know?” our response is always: “Yeah, sure…so what did I look like?”

The dreams I love the most are these where I dupe myself, making it all up but staying honest, showing myself some possible life I could lead. Similarly, the writing I love the most has these same qualities, presenting the fake and fabricated as plausible and true-to-life. Only fiction—set in the arena of possibilities—can do this. Nonfiction—set in the arena of actualities—abhors the fake and the fabricated. It loves facts and things that have been done. And thus, while nonfiction can only let us know everything that has happened or is happening, fiction tells us everything that could happen. It’s a much sexier arena to work in.

I’ve seen this make-it-all up approach to fiction in the writers I’ve been reading fervently in the past few years. It’s in the more recent fiction of David Foster Wallace and almost all of George Saunders’ work. It’s also, perhaps most comprehensively, in Ben Katchor’s comic strip, Julius Knipl, Real Estate Photographer. Knipl lives in an unnamed metropolis of ointment experts, travelogue theaters, and nail-biting salons that is very clearly the New York City of Katchor’s wildest dreams. The strip is a weekly absurdist tableau underneath which lie the subtle human truths of salesmen’s ambitions, unbreakable routines, and lonely urbanites. It’s the strangest of fictions, and it affects you in the strangest of ways.

Because of this affection I feel for my finest dreams and my favorite novels, it’s clear to me that fiction can create a relationship between writer and reader more intimate and direct than nonfiction can. It’s this reason that I want to learn to write fiction. At this stage in my career, I’m a wholly untrained fiction writer, working on instinct, feeling out the medium. What I need now is study, practice, and guidance. What I crave is the opportunity to learn something new, while also developing my current talents.

This is why graduate study in fiction writing at Emerson—with its courses in publishing and its possibilities for multidisciplinary study—is an ideal choice for me. I’m ready to work; Emerson’s high credit requirements aren’t daunting, they’re exciting. Plus, I’m looking forward to studying at Emerson for its feeling of community, letting me take intimate workshops to develop alongside my peers—all of us, hopefully, with a thing or two to teach each other.

I did not get into Emerson. I didn’t get in anywhere, if I recall. Or maybe this is the one that got me into Nebraska? I didn’t get in anywhere else, and this statement, it goes without saying, would not have landed me the jobs I’ve got since graduate school. Take that, nonfiction!

The Best Joke So Far in Freud’s Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious

The Schadchen[†] was defending the girl he had proposed against the young man’s protests. “I don’t care for the mother-in-law,” said the latter. “She’s a disagreeable, stupid person.” — “But after all you’re not marrying the mother-in-law. What you want is her daughter.” — “Yes, but she’s not young any longer, and she’s not precisely a beauty.” — “No matter. If she’s neither young nor beautiful she’ll be all the more faithful to you.” — “And she hasn’t much money.” — “Who’s talking about money? Are you marrying money then? After all it’s a wife that you want.” — “But she’s got a hunchback too.” — “Well, what do you want? Isn’t she to have a single fault?”

It’s not without tedium, the book, but not an unwelcome one to read alongside Didion’s Year of Magical Thinking (for teaching) and Barbara Walters’s How to Talk with Practically Anybody about Practically Anything (for before bed, and for learning much about how to be a considerate person).

Footnotes    (↵ returns to text)

  1. Jewish marriage-broker.

How Many Surrealists Does It Take to Change a Lightbulb?

  • 10: 1 to change the lightbulb, and 9 to wrestle with the giant gecko in the bathroom!
  • A: Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bathtub with brightly colored machine tools.
  • Spoon.
  • Potato.
  • Fish.
  • Two. One to change it and one to throw a bucket of water out the window.
  • It takes one. Wait for the lightbulb to melt downward.
  • 51 – One to float to the ceiling to change it, while 50 more discuss the meaning of it…
  • Just the one, his name is Dali… but he is usually too tripped out on acid to change it.
  • The bicycle’s broken.
  • To get to the other side.
  • Two. One to hold the giraffe, and one to put the clocks in the bathtub.
  • A fish.
  • Chair.
  • Sweden.
  • Three. One to make the Jello, and two to fill the bathtub with brightly-painted power tools.
  • Purple.

Culled from the first two pages of search results.

Bill Callahan Comin’, Yo

That this is the weirdest photo I’ve ever seen of Bill Callahan in the fifteen years I’ve been a fan of his says more than I ever could about how Bill Callahan is a very weird guy.

bill_callahan

He’s also probably my favorite working musician, and now he’ll be my first San Francisco concert. At what’s called The Great American Music Hall. Nov 16. I’m excited, but I just realized I’ve made dinner plans I now need to break.

The point of this post is to share that pic with the one reader of this blog I know cares. Also, did you know we live two blocks away from “the Airplane house“? 1992’s Dave Madden would’ve just about shit.

New Cupboard: Becoming Monster

I include “The Cupboard” as a post category and really rarely ever use it.

The Cupboard is a quarterly pamphlet of creative prose I put together with two friends in different cities. It used to be an anonymous pamphlet stapled together by clumsy hands and left in places around Lincoln, Nebraska. Now it’s basically a series of prose chapbooks. Still printed in Lincoln, but distributed through the mail. It’s often a lot of work but it’s rarely thankless. I’m proud of it.

Here’s the cover for our latest volume, out last week:

higgs-cover
It’s an examination of the monstrous and the human and how they might intersect. Christopher Higgs is the right kind of person to be thinking about this. Not because he’s a monster but because he’s a great thinker. A stand-up guy.

The great thing about The Cupboard is that books only cost $5, which is what a beer costs in this town when you go macrobrew or local. Plus you can keep our books in your pocket much longer. Head over to our Web site to order a copy, or subscribe maybe and get four mailed to you over the course of a year(-ish).

A Watershed Moment: Louis CK Lampooned

How did I miss this incredible bit of James Adomian doing an dead-on impression of Louis CK? (Check ca. 00:30, 00:50, et al.) I’m reminded of the rise of “What is the deal with X?” mock-Seinfeld jokes back in the mid-90s, except CK is so much harder to pin down vocally. “I want Kleenex and … cake. That’s all I want.”

Even more telling is Lake Bell’s response: “Oh my god, he gets me. He gets me!”

Very Good Paragraphs

From Baldwin’s “Notes of a Native Son”:

All of Harlem, indeed, seems to be infected by waiting. I had never before known it to be so violently still. Racial tensions throughout this country were exacerbated during the early years of the war, partly because the labor market brought together hundreds of thousands of ill-prepared people and partly because Negro soldiers, regardless of where they were born, received their military training in the south. What happened in defense plants and army camps had repercussions, naturally, in every Negro ghetto. The situation in Harlem had grown bad enough for clergymen, policemen, educators, politicians, and social workers to assert in one breath that there was no “crime wave” and to offer, in the very next breath, suggestions as to how to combat it. These suggestions always seemed to involve playgrounds, despite the fact that racial skirmishes were occurring in the playgrounds, too. Playground or not, crime wave or not, the Harlem police force had been augmented in March, and the unrest grew—perhaps, in fact, partly as a result of the ghetto’s instinctive hatred of policemen. Perhaps the most revealing news item, out of the steady parade of reports of muggings, stabbings, shooting, assaults, gang wars, and accusations of police brutality, is the item concerning six Negro girls who set upon a white girl in the subway because, as they all too accurately put it, she was stepping on their toes. Indeed she was, all over the nation.

Awe-some.

A Word or Two on MFA Rankings

It’s easy to point to MFA rankings as meaningless, but what they mean is that young people who are interested in devoting years of their lives to writing are looking at a limited set of programs around the country. Funding is key, as are low amounts of teaching. Programs that look like long-term residencies, or where New Yorker writers teach, rank very high. And who’s to say this isn’t the best way to learn how to write or what kind of writer to be?

I recently jumped ship from a MFA program ranked 11th this year in nonfiction to a program mentioned nowhere in the editorial pages of magazine, guardian of such rankings. N asked me how I felt about that, and here I am wondering.

The University of San Francisco’s MFA program is older than such ranked programs as Virginia Tech and New Mexico State, but we provide very limited funding, is probably why we’re not mentioned. (Perhaps exorbitantly is an apter adjective back there.) How do we attract students to our program when so many others are cheaper if not free, more or less? And how might we justify charging them such high tuition for a degree program that doesn’t grant its graduates the kind of guaranteed income of a medical or (ever decreasingly so) law degree?

These were the concerns I had when considering the job. The funding issue was the only impediment I had to moving as rapidly as we could out of the toxic state of Alabama. The best answer I got from my future colleagues was, “We’re aware of the problem and doing what we can to improve things.” And it’s true that we are. But then I got a look at our Program’s mission. From its second graf:

By fostering the analysis of self and world that is essential to ethical writing, the program also serves the university’s mission of educating hearts and minds. Designed to enable working adults to complete the MFA degree, the Program serves the university’s mission by creating an opportunity that might not otherwise exist for this student population.

In short, I teach at a night school, one housed at a research university committed to social justice,[*] and one with the resources and foresight to hire faculty in three genres who each makes me look like a chump.

It’s true that programs with funding require certain freedoms of its applicants—freedom from obligations, family, or career to devote two or more years of your life to study (and, often, teaching); and freedom from debts and other financial constraints to be able to live around the poverty level for years.

I don’t know demographics, but my money’s on that being a small, small percentage of 2013’s U.S. population.

I have parents as students, which is not a first but multiple parents in one class is. Most of my students work full-time jobs. Somehow amid all this they find the time to write what they’ve agreed to write and read the books we’ve agreed to discuss. That right there is a valuable lesson in how to be a writer: you make time amid obligations in your life to get your work done.

Does it matter where you go? Contentment and minimal disruption seem key. “Because they lack money, poor people must focus intensely on the economic consequences of expenditures that wealthy people consider trivial and not worth worrying over,” writes Cass R. Sunstein on scarcity in the latest New York Review. It can be hard to find the time to sit and read and think and write while high tuition costs make that kind of intense focus happen. Then again, one of my friends in town started writing out of financial necessity. Her most recent book was a Times bestseller. USF’s MFA program prints up a fortnightly newsletter. It’s called Signal for reasons I haven’t yet uncovered. Every issue there’s news about an alumnus’s newly published work.

Footnotes    (↵ returns to text)

  1. In 1951, the USF Dons were an undefeated but financially unsupportable football team. They received an invitation to the Orange Bowl, which would have given the athletic program the funds it needed to continue varsity football. But the Orange bowl demanded USF leave its two black players at home. USF refused, saw no bowl action, and promptly shut down its football program due to lack of funding. If you know me, plan on hearing this story multiple times over the next four decades.

A Vow I Hope Not to Break: No More “Live Tweeting”

If I invite you over to watch the Oscars (or the Super Bowl if you’re a straight guy), I am asking you to share an experience with me. Does that experience consist mostly of inflicting ourselves to advertisements together? Essentially yes. Whether it’s movies we should pay to see or football teams whose identity as commercial enterprises (even you, Packers) can’t be argued, televised events take place to sell us things.

Ads are increasingly entertaining, which is to say fun, and there’s nothing wrong with having a kind of mediated, managed, delivered fun together. It’s why I think you’re going to accept. We’ll together make our own constructed fun in the form of pretentious-speech snickering or tasty dips for chips. It’s part of the promise of inviting you over.

The problem with live tweeting*, I dunno, the VMAs, is that you haven’t accepted my invitation to do so. Which means you haven’t volunteered to submit yourself to advertising alongside me, and make no mistake: any tweets I—or you—might come up with about Miley Cyrus are advertisements for Cyrus, MTV, and whatever upcoming companies want to try to capitalize on 2013’s favorite dance-craze/wacky-word twerking.

No longer wanting to work as an advertiser for a product that saw me as little else is why I left Facebook. As a writer, I like the constraints of Twitter too much to abandon it, but here’s a practice I can happily ditch.

Now, can I encourage others to do so?


*Live Tweeting‘s a redundant term, in that without third-party apps you can’t schedule tweets for later. It’s a hypercorrection or maybe a malapropism on live blogging, which—at least commercially—refers to something beyond the norm: posting blog entries immediately after they’re typed. I write this, but no way I’m going to change people’s usage on this one.

Ohrwurmmörder

Despite its colorfulness I don’t like the term earworm, but we all get songs stuck in our heads. Or? Man, is there someone who’s never had a song stuck in her head? I want to meet such a person.

At any rate, what I also have are songs that I start singing in my head to kill the earworms I get, songs that are incredibly catchy and sticky but which I also enjoy. I’ve got two, both extremely fey and twee. One’s Belle & Sebastian’s “White Collar Boy”:

The other’s Of Montreal’s “Labyrinthian Pomp”:

I’m especially fond of this stretch of the lyrics:

I got my Georgie Fruit on.
He’s a dark mutation
for my demented pastime:
giving replicators somewhere to go.
But we’re authentic.
You can test my talons
against your cursive body.
The Controller Spheres have disappeared and it hurts!

I think it’s the sudden shriek of pain after so much posturing and strut.

The whole point of this post is to get my three readers to post what their Earworm Killers are, as a kind of public service. When Katy Perry gets stuck in your head, what helps you boot her out?

Herbas Buenas

Herblock coined the term McCarthyism in an editorial cartoon he did for the Washington Post, my childhood home’s daily paper. He won multiple Pulitzers. In this house in Sonoma County N & I are staying at (its backyard pictured right) there’s a copy in one of the bedrooms of Don’t Call It Frisco, a collection of daily columns Herb Caen wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle (among others). It’s my new daily. Caen coined the term beatnik; his Pulitzer was honorary.

There’s a post to be written about what it means to begin my life in a city where one Herb combated political corruption and to end it (conceivably) in a city where another Herb spread gossip. But that’s not this post. This post is about two things I learned from reading Caen’s book this afternoon—half of which concerns Frisco[1] movers-and-shakers of the 1950s and is thus chiefly unreadable.

FIRST THING: Narrative turns the merely uncanny into jokes

Greg Hobson, an aspiring artist who sells suits at Moore’s […], walk[ed] in Bernstein’s Fish Grotto and ask[ed] for a whole crab. When it was brought to him, he studied it carefully and then decided: “It’s the wrong color. Bring me another.”

Well, they thought he was a little peculiar, to say the least, but they brought him another. This one was O.K. […]

As you’ve guessed by now, Hobson wanted the crab for painting, not eating, And after he’d done the crab’s portrait, his fellow workers at Moore’s admired the canvas so much that it was hung in the suit department.

A few days later, a suit customer walked in, saw the painting of the crab, and said: “I’d like to buy that to hang in my office.” Which he did. The purchaser: George Skaff, then manager of Bernstein’s Fish Grotto.

Greg Hobson’s crab was home again.

I can think of a tweet or a Fun Fact: The painted crab at Bernstein’s was actually bought at Bernstein’s. Wacky, huh? Only in New York![2] Backing up, starting from the top, delaying the end—now you’re on your way to a joke.

SECOND THING: Perspective matters a lot and it’s hard to get out of your own

I won’t blockquote the whole thing because it’s not that good, but Caen talks about some reportage misfires, one being the car that never moved. He got a call from a woman about this car that had been parked across the street from her house for more than five years, but the weird thing was that the license plates got updated and the tires were always full of air. Who would bother with such a car? Caen called up the neighbors. Got no answer from the very house where the car was parked, but was told a similar story by the guy next door. Every day, same car, same position.

Caen wrote it up in the column the next day. Then he got a phonecall from the car’s bewildered owner: he worked every night from 11 to 7 (and I guess back in the 1950s it was possible to leave all night and find your same parking spot waiting for you). “It was simply that the three neighbors I had checked had never talked to him, and had never seen him drive the car,” writes Caen.

I was reminded of a thing that happened in grad school. I had four different offices on the third floor of Andrews Hall over the seven years that I worked there, and throughout that time there was a certain member of the faculty who, it seemed, was always in the men’s room when I went to the men’s room. Every time. Somehow this came up in conversation with my friend Tyrone. “He’s gotta piss like seventeen times a day,” I said. “I mean, he’s always in there.”

“You see him so often,” Tyrone said, “maybe he’s saying the same thing about you.”

I couldn’t’ve been given a better lesson in POV had they bothered to design a whole course around it.

Footnotes    (↵ returns to text)

  1. “‘Frisco’ is a nickname that reminds the city uncomfortably of the early, brawling, boisterous days of the Barbary Coast and the cribs and sailors who were shanghaied,” writes Caen on his opening page, giving us an excellent reason to start calling it Frisco again. And Caen’s now wrong when he later writes that “only tourists call it ‘Frisco,’ anyway.” I learned nobody called it that from one of Eddie Izzard’s early specials. Plus also my dad endearingly calls it Frisco (something he likely picked up while stationed among the cribs here, en route to ‘Nam), and in the way I initially identified as a Republican and, like, am also circumcised I feel certain paterfamilial ties when I do the same.
  2. Caen likes to point out how utterly San Franciscan certain types and goings-on are, when what they really just are is urban.

Very Good Paragraphs

Yet another example of Willa Cather nailing the experience of living in the Plains. From her letters (as quoted in Hermione Lee’s piece on them in the New York Review):

“Bigness” is the subject of my story. The West always paralyzes me a little. When I run away from it I remember only the tang on the tongue. But when I come back [I] always feel a little of the fright I felt when I was a child. I always feel afraid of losing something…. I never can entirely let myself go with the current; I always fight it just a little…. It is partly the feeling that there are so many miles—wait till you travel ’em!—between you and anything, and partly the fear that the everlasting wind may make you contented and put you to sleep. I used always to be sure that I’d never get out, that I would die in a cornfield. Now I know I will get out again, but I still get attacks of fright.

Boldface added on a sentence that in its syntax makes in my heart a thrumming go on.

Our Bay Area Home Search, the Short Version

We looked at 24 different places in three different cities over five days, and then despite our belongings and homebody interests we took a small one-bedroom in San Francisco.

It means we’ll need to keep a lot of our stuff in storage. It means that friends and family visiting won’t be as comfortable as we’d hoped they’d be. It means whatever dinner parties we throw will be for two others, max, or held at a restaurant. It means, overall, a far vaster change in our way of life than we’d presumed all those months ago, when the idea of moving to San Francisco became an actual event to plan for.

But it also means we’ll be two blocks from my new office at USF, four blocks from the Whole Foods on Haight Street, one block from the free USF gym we get to use, and zero blocks from Golden Gate Park. (We’re just across the street.) It means we can save a lot of money to use for the kind of traveling we haven’t been able to afford for years. It means we have free parking in a garage for our car we don’t use much, and two bus lines that pick us up right outside our building.

See?

And from there, while we wait, on a clear(er) day, here’s our view:

We hope you visit. We’re going to get such a comfortable couch.

On Teaching Nonfiction in the Academy But Outside Journalism Departments

It’s weird, this placement. In J-school you call it “feature writing” or “magazine writing” but in MFA school you call it “creative nonfiction” (CNF). Near the end (please!) of our house-hunting trip in San Francisco here, I’ve been prompted to think about this problem by Erika Dreifus’s blog post On the Teaching of Creative Nonfiction. “[O]ur reading lists reinforce an impression that creative nonfiction writers are inspired only by private memory,” she writes. Her subtitle is “Only a Few Have a Natural Talent for Nudity”.

It’s no surprise that I’m on the side of Dreifus re memoir’s overshadowing of other NF approaches in CNF instruction in the academy. One thing she doesn’t get at in her post, and which I want to get at quickly here, is this argument: memoir-heaviness is a factor of the current instructor landscape. In most MFA programs, NF isn’t taught by NF writers, but rather by people (usually fiction writers) who also write NF.

From Dreifus:

The discussion reminded me of similar ideas I’d had back when I was an MFA student myself. Remember that I attended a low-residency MFA program, and I was a fiction specialist. I was therefore provided cnf instruction only within the framework of the “gateway” seminars all of us attended, regardless of selected genre.

If your work consists of the building of scenes full of sensory detail to recreate an experience, naturally memoir is the thing you’ll select to read and practice. It’s fiction but true, all other rules apply.

There’s a number of schools with dedicated NF courses on the books taught by working NF writers, but they are the minority. This may very well change. More and more people seem to want to write NF and even spend time and money getting MFA degrees in same, meaning that administrators will (in a happy world) work to attract such students by hiring dedicated NF faculty members. Utah, Ohio, Missouri, etc. will continue to graduate PhD students who’ve read NF booklists for their comps and know a thing or two about essay theory, and thus be qualified to teach a broad scope of NF subgenres and approaches.

I don’t have a way out of this post. In procrastinating to find one, I changed my weather.gov bookmark to pull up the weather for San Francisco, where N & I live now. It was a silly exercise. Every day it wavers between 64 and 72, depending on whether the clouds are in or not. Usually they are. I packed one pair of jeans, another pair of paint-stained workjeans, a pair of khakis, and a pair of corduroys that no longer button around my waist after a summer of sitting in cars and drinking every night. The rest of my clothes won’t be getting here until mid-August, at which point it may get regularly warm enough to start wearing shorts.

Twitter tells me people on the east coast are hot.

Welcoming The Essay Review

I’m very glad The Essay Review exists. What I’ve found since I left graduate school and started teaching nonfiction is mostly a dearth of criticism on nonfiction, so yes: it’s time for us in the academy to put aside our CNF junk and argue smart things about how our genre operates and what makes it distinct. Lucky for us, smart arguments are themselves nonfiction, so it still feels like we’re getting real work done.

However, am I the only one who reads the following, printed in TER‘s first issue…

The essay, Montaignan [sic] or not, does not generally move into textual lecturing, does not become self-righteous, and does not budge from its original humble professorship or lose its ability to examine the quotidian with a careful eye. [. . .] The essay should maintain its power with virility and ardor.

…and wants to immediately start committing himself to essays that lecture, are self-righteous, that quit with examining the quotidian, and that seek never to establish any virile power?

I mean, it’s weird how everyone goes on and on about the essay as undefineable genre and then yet loves to pin down exactly what an essay should do in all its dumb glory. Let’s, yes, come up with a theory of how essays work. Some essays? Absolutely. All essays? Good luck. In the meantime, don’t tell me how my essays should behave.

Or, no: do. Do tell me. It’ll make me write something better out of spite.

Thanks to Barry Grass for the heads-up on this new publication.

Very Good Paragraphs

From Paul Bloom’s essay on the amoral results of empathy in the 20 May 2013 New Yorker:

Newtown, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, was inundated with so much charity that it became a burden. More than eight hundred volunteers were recruited to deal with the gifts that were sent to the city—all of which kept arriving despite earnest pleas from Newtown officials that charity be directed elsewhere. A vast warehouse was crammed with plush toys the townspeople had no use for; millions of dollars rolled in to this relatively affluent community. We felt their pain; we wanted to help. Meanwhile—just to begin a very long list—almost twenty million American children go to bed hungry each night, and the federal food-stamp program is facing budget cuts of almost twenty per cent. Many of the same kindly strangers who paid for Baby Jessica’s medical needs support cuts to state Medicare programs—cuts that will affect millions. Perhaps fifty million Americans will be stricken next year by food-borne illness, yet budget reductions mean that the F.D.A. will be conducting two thousand fewer safety inspections. Even more invisibly, next year the average American will release about twenty metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and many in Congress seek to loosen restrictions on greenhouse gases even further.

The piece can be summed up to this, in the graf that follows: “If a planet of billions is to survive, however, we’ll need to take into consideration the welfare of people not yet harmed.” Also: people whose names we don’t know and whose faces we never see on television. A solid argument. Go read it here.

Al Jackson at the Comedy Club of Williamsburg

Around 5pm the power at my folks’ house went out, just minutes into a windy thunderstorm. Too few trees felled to cause such havoc, but it seemed to make tonight the night to check out the new Comedy Club of Williamsburg my mom had excitedly emailed me about two weeks ago.

Turns out it just opened. This is the fourth weekend of comics performing in a conference room at the DoubleTree near Busch Gardens, and I hadn’t heard of either comic. We figured the movie theaters would be packed (75,000 people without power in all of Hampton Roads), so we went and bought a pitcher at the sports bar, Pitchers.

The room seated 64 people and once Manager Ed Kappes took the stage there were all of 14 in the audience. Average age was middle age. Save for the teens there, inexplicably, with their grandparents, I was the youngest in the room.

(Oh and I went with N, which was our first time in a comedy club together. He’s a good audience member, generous with his laughter and eager to participate. He made me feel like I had to do better, what with my stupid notebook. All comics should give him free tix.)

At any rate, I want to talk about two things here:

  1. What it’s like to be part of a 14-person audience at a comedy club.
  2. What tags are in jokes, and how they are funny and how they are not funny.

Continue reading Al Jackson at the Comedy Club of Williamsburg

Ways Toward Lyricism

Dithered over that title’s preposition and decided that opting for the positive would help everyone in the mess that’s to come.

I.
If good students are the ones who enter every class full of passion and curiosity, Joey’s been one of my best. The other night we had a Twitter exchange he covers clearly and in full in a blog post that you should go read if you’re the type who likes watching writers dicker with themselves in public about writing problems (and if you aren’t: hi, Mom). In essence:

Sardonically, I tweeted: “Sorry Paul Harding, you only get to use the word ‘eerie’ once in a novel, not once every three pages.” Dave Madden, my former professor, responded: “But he got that novel published & won the Pulitzer for it, so clearly he got to use the word ‘eerie’ as much as he felt he needed to.”

Turns out I was wrong about which Harding novel Joey was referring to, but I stand by my argument all the same.

And I stand by Joey’s. Writers grow by reacting against published work and letting this reaction push their own writing elsewhere. The danger in this, though, is in thinking of good writing as writing that’s gonna wow the shit out of your workshop peers. And from where I’ve been and where I’ve taught, nothing wows a workshop more than a well-placed word in a novel sentence such that something sonically beautiful happens—i.e., lyricism.
Continue reading Ways Toward Lyricism